The President
has decided to support a Super PAC. He
opposed the Supreme Court decision that allowed for these political action committees that can receive and spend
unlimited money from special interests, including corporations. He said he wouldn’t use them. Now he has decided he will. Many are accusing him of hypocrisy, lying,
and worse.
The President had two choices. First, he could keep abstain from any involvement
or acknowledgment of Super PACs, while Republicans are using them to gather
millions and millions of dollars (Romney’s alone has raised 30 million). He could hope that taking the high road
combined with the sizeable amount of money he has raised on his own would be
enough to counter the influence of the spending of these millions, mostly on
negative ads.
His other choice is the one he has gone
with … to decide to use all legal means to advance his candidacy and at the
same time pledge to work to change the system so all these means are not
available in the future. He opens up
another potential source of funds, while also opening himself up to criticism.
It can’t have been an easy choice. Neither option is without risk. Each one has a compelling logic. On the one hand, you are sticking to your
principles. On the other you are saying
that to allow the Republicans to have a significant advantage would be to run
the risk of making a much larger sacrifice.
I think that it would have been hard to find fault with either
choice. Certainly, it is hard to take Republican
accusations of hypocrisy seriously. The
President made a tough decision and explained it. It’s what he has tried to do since day
one. That’s what I want my President to
do. I don’t ask that the President be
always right, no one is. I don’t ask
that the President always make the same decision I would, no one should or
would. I ask that my President make,
rather than shy away from, the tough decisions.
I as that my President explain those decisions. That’s it.
It seems easy, but history has not shown it to be easy. I think that this President has, for the most
part, has made and explained the tough decisions. That’s why I’m voting for him. Certainly the fact that he is using the same
means to raise money as his opponents is not going to change my mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment