DEAR CRABBY: Do you
think it is legitimate to compare Republican sponsored voter ID legislation to
voting restrictions put in place in the South in the wake of the civil war? -Jim Crow
DEAR MR. CROW: In a word … yes.
You don’t have to be swayed by the comparison, but it is a legitimate
one. Republicans who sponsor such bills
say they are meant to prevent voter fraud.
It is completely possible; however, that the real motivation is that
Republicans believe these laws will help them in the next election. There is
every reason to believe that the folks who do not have picture ID’s and/or will
have the most trouble getting them are Democratic voters. Further, there is every reason to believe that
a disproportionate number of these folks are minorities. If these reasonable suspicions are more than
suspicions, then the Republican Party is passing legislation that they know
will disenfranchise minorities. That is
why politicians in the South collected poll taxes and enacted literacy
requirements. If you are offended by
this line of thinking, then you will need to give us a reason. You will need to prove that these laws aren’t
just about keeping some Democrats, many of them minorities, away from the polls. It isn’t enough to dismiss the accusations as
offensive. Enough evidence has been
presented that you now need to give a substantive response.
No comments:
Post a Comment