If you see America as the culmination of the success of a
lot of individuals doing what is best for themselves, how do you justify voting
in lock step on every issue with everyone else in your party? We know every Republican doesn’t agree on
every issue and that every Republican doesn’t believe that government and taxes
are always bad. So why do they suppress their individual
beliefs for the good of the collective? Why
is it OK for the Republican Party to use the threat of supporting a rival in
the next primary to keep folks from supporting health care reform, but not OK
for the government can’t use fines to encourage environmentally responsible
behavior? Compromise to save the
environment or provide medical care is horrible, but compromise to save the
Republican Party is OK? I suppose whatever
It is that allows a person to criticize a fellow Republican for “impure
thoughts” for considering raising revenue to reduce a deficit, also allows them
to fight hard to protect embryos and stem cells but dismiss the murder of women
and children by remote control planes as collateral damage. So, while it may be hypocrisy, it’s also
really useful. An individual certainly
should be able to do whatever is best for themselves … even if it isn’t always
what’s best for themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment